“How can that possibly be legal?”
Why Ohio HB 170, as written, lets a CO2 storage project reach your mailbox only after the outcome is mostly decided
01
What the law never requires anyone to tell you
The statute imposes no duty to notify a landowner at any of these moments:
•
When a test well is drilled nearby. Its results can be held confidential for five years (ORC 1509.051).
•
When the company draws a storage boundary that includes your land. The map is theirs; disclosure is not required.
•
When landmen begin leasing your neighbors. These are private contracts, often with confidentiality clauses.
•
When the 70% consent threshold is crossed and your remaining 30% becomes legally poolable.
Each of those steps is lawful precisely because the law is silent about them. Silence in a statute is permission.
02
The first notice the law requires, and when it arrives
The state’s first mandatory notice to you is triggered by the company’s consolidation application, the filing it makes only after it already holds 70% consent. The chief of ODNR sends notice to all pore-space owners in the proposed facility within 30 days of deeming that application complete. ORC 1509.76
By the time the letter arrives, the boundary has been drawn, by the company.
The 70% has been assembled, privately.
The geology work is done, and sealed.
A permit application may already be pending.
The letter is not an invitation to decide. It is notification of a proceeding whose main question is already framed.
03
Why it was written this way
HB 170’s consolidation process was modeled on Ohio’s decades-old oil and gas “unitization” law, a tool built to stop one holdout from blocking a drilling unit. The legislature copied that private-property, deal-by-deal framework onto carbon storage. The result: the law treats a CO2 project as a series of individual land transactions, not a community decision.
Your protections in the statute are individual, and they are thin:
•
Good-faith negotiation plus a notarized affidavit of three contact attempts, owed only to owners the company pursues.
•
A hearing, but the question is whether the project is “reasonably necessary,” not whether you consent.
•
An order must issue within 60 days of the hearing. Payment for pooled owners is set by the state, not negotiated.
Nothing in the statute gives a township, a neighborhood, or a majority of residents any collective say at all.
04
Legal is not the same as unstoppable
The law’s silence cuts both ways: nothing requires you to wait for a letter, either.
•
Refuse to sign, and say so out loud. The 70% is built on quiet, one-at-a-time agreements. Neighbors comparing notes is the one thing the leasing model cannot price in.
•
Comment on the ODNR rulemaking. The rules implementing consolidation are still being written, including how the 70% is measured. That comment period is public.
•
Intervene where standing exists: power plant siting cases before the Ohio Power Siting Board and, later, the Class VI permit comment period both allow formal public participation.
•
Document every landman contact: date, name, company, offer. Report it to the address below.
Under HB 170, the only early warning system is a neighbor talking to a neighbor.
The statute delivers its first letter after the outcome is mostly decided. Whether that letter surprises this community is up to us.
Sources: Ohio HB 170 as enacted · ORC 1509.051 (test well confidentiality), 1509.71 (definitions), 1509.76 (consolidation, notice, hearing, 60-day order), 5301.58 (pore space ownership).
Community education, not legal advice. · EX-44 · Current as of August 29, 2026.
Questions or leasing activity to report: info@fairfieldgrounded.org